boat vs Islo
Islo and boat both run every sandbox as a VM with its own kernel, with credentials kept outside and coding agents built in. boat adds a desktop for computer use, /dev/kvm for emulators and ports you can host on, and it costs less in every scenario below.
Where boat stands out
A desktop agents can see and use
Every boat sandbox has a 60fps desktop with Chromium, a computer-use API for clicks and keys, and a stream you can embed in your app. Islo sandboxes are headless: they have a browser for tests, but no screen and no computer-use API.
Nested virtualization and systemd
boat gives every machine root, systemd, Docker and /dev/kvm, so an agent can run Android emulators, Firecracker or a VM of its own inside the sandbox. Islo runs Docker inside its microVMs, but its docs do not mention /dev/kvm or nested virtualization.
Ports you can host on
On boat you can serve up to 50 ports over HTTPS with token protection, open raw TCP, and keep the URLs as long as the sandbox lives. Islo shares one HTTP port per link, anyone with the URL can open it, and it expires after a TTL, 24 hours by default.
The companies and products
boat
boat.dev runs sandboxes for AI agents: each one is a full Linux VM with its own kernel.
You start a machine with one command or one API call, then SSH in, run Docker, open a desktop, or let a built-in agent (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and others) work in it. The disk stays between sessions, and a stopped sandbox costs nothing.
- Isolation
- Full VM per sandbox, own kernel
- Regions
- EU: Germany, Finland, France
Islo
Islo is an agent sandbox from Incredibuild: each coding agent gets its own microVM, with network rules and credentials handled at a gateway.
An Islo sandbox is a Linux microVM with its own kernel, built from a container image, with Claude Code, Cursor CLI and Codex preinstalled. Outbound traffic can pass through a gateway that allows or blocks hosts, injects credentials and logs every request. It is built for teams that run coding agents, evals and RL rollouts in the background, on Islo's cloud or in their own cloud account.
- Launched
- May 4, 2026
Which use cases each one fits
For each use case, Battleships prices every sandbox provider on the same workload and sorts them from the cheapest monthly bill up. “3rd cheapest of 367” means 2 of the other 366 providers run that workload, with every feature it needs, for less. “With limits” means the provider runs it but misses something, so it is listed after every full match. Open a use case for its whole ranking and what each provider misses.
| Use case and its workload | boat: price rank | Islo: price rank |
|---|---|---|
| Software factory 100 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 2,200 sessions of 8 h a month Islo runs Docker inside its microVMs, but no /dev/kvm or desktop is documented, so Android emulators and browser testing on a screen need boat. | 3rd cheapest of 367 $634 a month | 326th of 367, with limits $7,402 a month |
| Always-on AI employees 50 machines 24/7 · 2 vCPU / 4 GB Both fit, since both keep a VM running with no session cap; Islo can pause an idle assistant with its memory and wake it on the next request. | 5th cheapest of 366 $657 a month | 30th cheapest of 366 $9,928 a month |
| Code interpreter bursts 100 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 200,000 sessions of 1 min a month Neither is a perfect fit for one-minute bursts: Islo needs a raised concurrency limit, and boat's start limits queue very large bursts. | 186th of 345, with limits $2,000 a month | 153rd of 345, with limits $503 a month |
| Sandboxes for your users 300 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 23 min a month 300 sandboxes for your users at once is more than the 50 running sandboxes reported for Islo's Team plan, so it needs a custom limit there. | Cheapest of 361 $209 a month | 171st of 361, with limits $3,160 a month |
| RL rollouts 1,000 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 1,000,000 sessions of 3 min a month | 34th of 360, with limits $2,000 a month | 167th of 360, with limits $15,265 a month |
| Agent evals 250 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 15,000 sessions of 20 min a month Islo has a built-in Harbor integration with $250 of credit for Harbor users and gateway rules that stop trials from looking up answers; boat runs evals on more sandboxes at once. | 10th cheapest of 364 $200 a month | 198th of 364, with limits $2,456 a month |
| CI runners 40 at once · 8 vCPU / 16 GB · 6,000 sessions of 12 min a month | 4th cheapest of 377 $86 a month | 119th cheapest of 377 $1,507 a month |
| 24/7 dev boxes 1 machine 24/7 · 4 vCPU / 8 GB | 18th cheapest of 368 $26 a month | 112th cheapest of 368 $402 a month |
| Computer-use agents 50 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 20,000 sessions of 15 min a month Islo sandboxes are headless with no screen or computer-use API, while boat streams a 60fps desktop with Chromium that agents can see and click. | 6th cheapest of 369 $200 a month | 310th of 369, with limits $2,210 a month |
| Browser-use agents 50 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 10 min a month Islo has a browser for testing inside the sandbox; boat adds a visible desktop and a computer-use API on top of browser control. | 7th cheapest of 367 $200 a month | 113th of 367, with limits $1,105 a month |
| Scraping & bots (startup scale) 50 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 100,000 sessions of 3 min a month | 6th cheapest of 346 $90 a month | 66th cheapest of 346 $748 a month |
| Mass scraping & bots (undetectable) 1,000 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 3,000,000 sessions of 2 min a month | 71st of 338, with limits $1,800 a month | 265th of 338, with limits $14,966 a month |
| Parallel red teaming 200 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 5,000 sessions of 30 min a month | 2nd cheapest of 360 $200 a month | 47th of 360, with limits $746 a month |
| GPU eval jobs 10 at once · 8 vCPU / 32 GB · 500 sessions of 30 min a month | Can't run it | Can't run it |
| macOS agents 5 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 1,000 sessions of 20 min a month | Can't run it | Can't run it |
Key features
Every feature Battleships tracks (43)
| Feature | boat | Islo |
|---|---|---|
| Full VM (own kernel) | Yes | Yes |
| Docker inside | Yes | Yes |
| Nested virtualization | Yes | No |
| Root | Yes | Yes |
| Systemd | Yes | Not published |
| Desktop GUI | Yes | No |
| Browser | Yes | Yes |
| Computer-use API | Yes | No |
| SSH | Yes | Yes |
| Persistent disk | Yes | Yes |
| Pause/resume | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic snapshots | Yes | Yes |
| Fork/clone | Yes | Yes |
| Live fork (no pause) | Yes | Yes |
| Memory fork | No | No |
| Custom image (Docker or snapshot) | Yes | Yes |
| ≥24 h sessions | Yes | Yes |
| Idle auto-stop | No | Yes |
| Wake on request | No | Yes |
| HTTPS preview URLs | Yes | Yes |
| Raw TCP inbound | Yes | No |
| Public IPv4 | No | No |
| Egress allowlist | No | Yes |
| Secret proxy | Yes | Yes |
| Secret proxy for any API | Yes | Yes |
| Preinstalled agents | Yes | Yes |
| Agent harness API | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | No | No |
| GPU | No | No |
| Windows | No | No |
| Arm64 | No | No |
| Self-hosting | No | No |
| BYOC | No | Yes |
| Open source | No | No |
| Scoped API keys | Yes | Not published |
| Spend limits | Yes | Not published |
| Usage per sandbox (API) | Yes | Yes |
| Audit logs | No | Yes |
| SSO | No | Yes |
| SOC 2 | No | Not published |
| HIPAA | No | Not published |
| EU data residency | Yes | No |
| Zero data retention | Yes | Not published |
Performance
There is no comparable measurement: Islo was not part of StarSling's public sandbox benchmark run or the other public results we use. In StarSling's run of 2026-09-29, boat did 26.69 Node.js build-and-test runs per second at 4 vCPU / 8 GB on dedicated AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (Zen 5) hosts.
Node.js build-and-test loop at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, higher is better. Measured with the open hpc-sandbox-benchmarks suite. Islo has no published run in this suite yet, so there is no like-for-like number to compare.
Pricing in five scenarios
Each bill is priced from the providers' public price lists by the open Battleships engine, with the cheapest plan that runs the scenario.
| Scenario | boat, a month | Islo, a month |
|---|---|---|
| One coding agent, workdays 4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, 8 hours a day, 22 days a month, files kept between days | $20 · $20/mo | $101 · Free |
| One agent that never stops 4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, running 24/7 all month | $26 · $20/mo | $420 · Free |
| 50 agents in parallel 50 machines of 4 vCPU / 8 GB at once, 8-hour sessions, 1,100 sessions a month, Docker inside | $317 · $20/mo × 3 seats | $4,863 · Team |
| Sandboxes for your users 2 vCPU / 4 GB, 30,000 sessions of 10 minutes a month, up to 300 at once | $200 · $100/mo × 2 seats | $1,382 · Team · with limits |
| 1,000 short jobs at once 2 vCPU / 4 GB, 1,000 at once, 3 minutes each, 200,000 jobs a month | $2,000 · $2000/mo · with limits | $3,053 · Team · with limits |
boat: You pick a monthly plan from $20, and all of it becomes usage credit spent per second on running sandboxes. A stopped sandbox costs nothing and keeps its disk.
Islo: Islo bills each CPU core and each GB of memory and disk you give a sandbox while it runs, billed per hour, with no plan fee. An idle sandbox keeps billing until a pause-after-idle timer fires, and that timer can only be set when the sandbox is created; egress has no published price.
Limits in those scenarios
Islo's Team plan is reported at 50 running sandboxes at once, and paused ones do not count. That is why 300 sandboxes for your users and 1,000 short jobs at once do not fit Islo without a custom contract. On boat the limit is a sandbox count (100 to 2,000 by plan) plus starts per minute, so the 1,000-job burst gets queued and needs more starts per day than the $2,000 plan allows. Islo publishes no egress price, so every Islo total here leaves egress out.
| Scenario | boat | Islo |
|---|---|---|
| One coding agent, workdays | None that bite |
|
| One agent that never stops | None that bite |
|
| 50 agents in parallel | None that bite |
|
| Sandboxes for your users | None that bite |
|
| 1,000 short jobs at once |
|
|
Which one should you use?
Use Islo when
you need per-host egress rules with a log of every outbound call, sandboxes that pause with memory and wake on request, or a US region or your own cloud account.
- Egress rules and request logs. Useful if you must control what agents reach: Islo allows or blocks each host, path and method, and logs every call.
- Pause with memory, wake on request. Useful for agents that sit idle between tasks: Islo pauses them with memory kept and resumes on the next request.
- US region and your own cloud. Useful if your data must stay in the US or in your own cloud account: Islo runs in US West or under BYOC.
Use boat when
your agents need more than a shell: a desktop for computer use, /dev/kvm for emulators, ports you can host on, and up to 2,000 sandboxes at once on a full VM in the EU.
- A desktop agents can see and use. An agent that has to check a UI, fill a form in a real app or show a person what it did needs a screen. On Islo you would install a VNC stack and a control layer yourself in each image.
- Nested virtualization and systemd. Mobile app tests, OS work and tools that start their own VMs stop at the first emulator boot without /dev/kvm. Software emulation, where it works at all, runs many times slower.
- Ports you can host on. A preview a teammate opens next week, a database a test client dials, or a game server on UDP or TCP needs a stable, private address. On Islo that means re-sharing links or running a CLI tunnel on your own machine.
Questions people ask
Is boat cheaper than Islo?
In every scenario we priced, yes: one coding agent on workdays comes to $20 a month on boat and $101 on Islo, and one agent running all month comes to $26 versus $420. 50 agents in parallel come to $317 versus $4,863. For 1,000 short jobs at once, boat lands at $2,000 and Islo at $3,053, and neither fits without higher limits.
Are Islo sandboxes containers or VMs?
VMs. Islo runs each agent computer in a microVM with its own kernel, built from a container image. boat also gives every sandbox a full VM, and adds systemd and /dev/kvm.
Does Islo have a desktop or computer use?
No. Islo sandboxes are headless Linux machines with a browser for testing, and its docs list no desktop or computer-use API. boat streams a 60fps desktop with Chromium and has a computer-use API on every sandbox.
Can I limit what an agent reaches on the internet?
On Islo, yes: a gateway profile allows or denies traffic by host, path and HTTP method, can block everything by default, and logs each request. boat sandboxes have open internet with no provider-side allowlist, while its credentials proxy keeps real API keys out of the sandbox.
Where does my data run?
boat runs only in the EU (Germany, Finland and France), with EU data residency and a zero data retention option. Islo runs in US West, or inside your own cloud account with BYOC.
Is boat SOC 2 compliant?
SOC 2 is in progress. We're open about where we stand: live status at status.ascii.dev and our data retention policy at docs.boat.dev/data-retention. Islo names no certification on its site and sends compliance documents on request.
Start a sandbox
Install the CLI, then run boat new.
7-day free trial
More comparisons
- boat vs E2B
- boat vs Daytona
- boat vs Modal
- boat vs Vercel Sandbox
- boat vs Blaxel
- boat vs Runloop
- boat vs Tensorlake
- boat vs Cloudflare Sandbox
- boat vs exe.dev
- boat vs Agent 37
- boat vs Oracle Cloud
- boat vs IONOS Cloud
- E2B vs Islo
- Daytona vs Islo
- Modal vs Islo
- Vercel Sandbox vs Islo
- Cloudflare Sandbox vs Islo
- Blaxel vs Islo
- Runloop vs Islo
- Tensorlake vs Islo