boat vs Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Kubernetes platform for running apps on a cluster you own or rent, and tools like Harbor run agent tasks on it as pods. boat gives each agent a whole Linux machine with Docker, a disk that keeps everything and coding agents ready to drive.

Where boat stands out

A whole machine, not a locked-down pod

A boat sandbox is a full VM with root, Docker, systemd, SSH and /dev/kvm. In Harbor's OpenShift setup each task is a pod under a custom SCC that forbids privileged containers and drops every Linux capability before adding a few back, so there is no Docker daemon and no /dev/kvm inside.

The disk stays, with snapshots and fork

boat saves the whole disk every minute and when a sandbox stops, a stopped sandbox costs nothing, and you can fork a running sandbox with its disk. On OpenShift only data on a mounted PVC outlives the pod, and Harbor's pod mounts none by default.

Built for agents, not apps

Claude Code, Codex and other agents come preinstalled, and you prompt, steer and follow them from outside through one API. Real API keys stay outside the sandbox in a credentials proxy, and each sandbox streams a 60fps desktop with Chromium and gets HTTPS URLs on up to 50 ports.

The companies and products

boat

boat.dev runs sandboxes for AI agents: each one is a full Linux VM with its own kernel.

You start a machine with one command or one API call, then SSH in, run Docker, open a desktop, or let a built-in agent (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and others) work in it. The disk stays between sessions, and a stopped sandbox costs nothing.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift is a Kubernetes application platform from Red Hat, a company founded in 1993 and part of IBM since 2019.

OpenShift is not a sandbox product. It is a platform for building and running containers on a cluster, either self-managed on your own machines or managed by Red Hat and its partners on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and IBM Cloud. The Harbor eval framework runs each agent task on it as a single non-privileged pod driven with oc exec, and that is where it overlaps with boat.

Which use cases each one fits

For each use case, Battleships prices every sandbox provider on the same workload and sorts them from the cheapest monthly bill up. “3rd cheapest of 367” means 2 of the other 366 providers run that workload, with every feature it needs, for less. “With limits” means the provider runs it but misses something, so it is listed after every full match. Open a use case for its whole ranking and what each provider misses.

Use case and its workloadboat: price rankRed Hat OpenShift: price rank
Software factory
100 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 2,200 sessions of 8 h a month
A coding agent that runs docker compose or builds images cannot do it in a Harbor pod under a non-privileged SCC; boat runs Docker inside every sandbox.
3rd cheapest of 367
$634 a month
234th of 367, with limits
$3,010 a month
Always-on AI employees
50 machines 24/7 · 2 vCPU / 4 GB
An assistant that lives on its machine all month needs packages and files to survive restarts; on OpenShift only mounted volumes (PVCs) survive, while boat keeps the whole disk.
5th cheapest of 366
$657 a month
239th of 366, with limits
$3,121 a month
Code interpreter bursts
100 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 200,000 sessions of 1 min a month
Short code runs suit OpenShift if you already pay for a cluster with spare worker nodes, since a pod starts on capacity you already have.
186th of 345, with limits
$2,000 a month
94th of 345, with limits
$143 a month
Sandboxes for your users
300 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 23 min a month
On OpenShift the number of user sandboxes at once is set by the size of your own cluster; boat gives every sandbox HTTPS URLs on up to 50 ports with no Routes to set up.
Cheapest of 361
$209 a month
107th of 361, with limits
$994 a month
RL rollouts
1,000 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 1,000,000 sessions of 3 min a month
34th of 360, with limits
$2,000 a month
74th of 360, with limits
$4,275 a month
Agent evals
250 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 15,000 sessions of 20 min a month
10th cheapest of 364
$200 a month
142nd of 364, with limits
$855 a month
CI runners
40 at once · 8 vCPU / 16 GB · 6,000 sessions of 12 min a month
CI jobs that build container images or Android apps need Docker or /dev/kvm; ordinary OpenShift pods have neither, while OpenShift Pipelines builds images its own way.
4th cheapest of 377
$86 a month
158th of 377, with limits
$410 a month
24/7 dev boxes
1 machine 24/7 · 4 vCPU / 8 GB
A dev box wants SSH and a disk that keeps installed packages; OpenShift gives oc rsh into a pod and keeps only what sits on a PVC.
18th cheapest of 368
$26 a month
270th of 368, with limits
$125 a month
Computer-use agents
50 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 20,000 sessions of 15 min a month
OpenShift pods are headless; boat streams a full Linux desktop at 60fps with Chromium for computer-use agents.
6th cheapest of 369
$200 a month
225th of 369, with limits
$855 a month
Browser-use agents
50 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 10 min a month
7th cheapest of 367
$200 a month
248th of 367, with limits
$428 a month
Scraping & bots (startup scale)
50 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 100,000 sessions of 3 min a month
6th cheapest of 346
$90 a month
233rd of 346, with limits
$214 a month
Mass scraping & bots (undetectable)
1,000 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 3,000,000 sessions of 2 min a month
71st of 338, with limits
$1,800 a month
146th of 338, with limits
$4,275 a month
Parallel red teaming
200 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 5,000 sessions of 30 min a month
2nd cheapest of 360
$200 a month
205th of 360, with limits
$214 a month
GPU eval jobs
10 at once · 8 vCPU / 32 GB · 500 sessions of 30 min a month
Neither is ranked here, but OpenShift does run GPU nodes through the NVIDIA and AMD GPU Operators, and boat has no GPUs.
Can't run itCan't run it
macOS agents
5 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 1,000 sessions of 20 min a month
Can't run itCan't run it

Key features

FeatureboatRed Hat OpenShift
IsolationFull VM with its own kernel on dedicated AMD Ryzen 9 9950X hostsCRI-O containers sharing the worker node's kernel; sandboxed containers as an optional add-on
Docker, systemd and rootRoot, Docker and systemd inside every sandboxRoot is possible under a custom SCC, but no privileged containers, so no Docker daemon inside the pod
Nested virtualizationYes, /dev/kvm for Android emulators and VMsNot in ordinary pods; /dev/kvm goes to OpenShift Virtualization's own VM launcher pods
Shell accessSSH into any sandboxoc exec and oc rsh through the Kubernetes API; no SSH daemon in the pod
What survives a stopThe whole disk, saved every minute and on stop; a stopped sandbox costs nothingOnly mounted volumes (PVCs); the container filesystem goes away with the pod
Snapshots and forkAutomatic snapshots every minute; fork a running sandbox with its diskOn-demand CSI snapshots of PVCs only; no fork of a running pod
Inbound accessHTTPS URLs for up to 50 ports, token-protected by default; raw TCP; dedicated IPv6 or IPv4Routes through the cluster's HAProxy router for HTTP and HTTPS, with IP allowlists; pods get no public IP of their own
Network controlsOpen internet, no provider-side allowlistEgress firewall by IP range, DNS name or port, plus NetworkPolicy rules per pod, set by the cluster admin
Keeping API keys out of the sandboxCredentials proxy for model providers and any HTTPS API; switch a credential to another account when credits run outSecrets mounted into the pod as files or environment variables
Coding agentsClaude Code, Codex, OpenCode and more preinstalled, with a prompt, steer and events APINone from Red Hat; Harbor brings its own harness and runs it with oc exec
Desktop and browserFull Linux desktop streamed at 60fps, with Chromium and computer useHeadless pods only
GPUsNoneGPU worker nodes through the NVIDIA GPU Operator and AMD GPU Operator
Operating systemsLinux on x86_64Linux on x86_64, ARM64 and more, and Windows Server containers on Windows nodes
Where it runsEU only (Germany, Finland, France), managed by boatYour own data centers, or managed on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and IBM Cloud in regions worldwide
Compliance and transparencySOC 2 is in progress. We're open about where we stand: live status and data retention policy.SOC 2
Every feature Battleships tracks (43)
FeatureboatRed Hat OpenShift
Full VM (own kernel)YesNo
Docker insideYesNo
Nested virtualizationYesNo
RootYesNot published
SystemdYesNot published
Desktop GUIYesNo
BrowserYesNo
Computer-use APIYesNo
SSHYesNo
Persistent diskYesYes
Pause/resumeYesNo
Automatic snapshotsYesNo
Fork/cloneYesNo
Live fork (no pause)YesNo
Memory forkNoNo
Custom image (Docker or snapshot)YesYes
≥24 h sessionsYesYes
Idle auto-stopNoNo
Wake on requestNoNo
HTTPS preview URLsYesYes
Raw TCP inboundYesNot published
Public IPv4NoNo
Egress allowlistNoYes
Secret proxyYesNo
Secret proxy for any APIYesNo
Preinstalled agentsYesNo
Agent harness APIYesNo
MCP serverNoNo
GPUNoYes
WindowsNoYes
Arm64NoYes
Self-hostingNoYes
BYOCNoYes
Open sourceNoYes
Scoped API keysYesNot published
Spend limitsYesNot published
Usage per sandbox (API)YesNo
Audit logsNoNot published
SSONoYes
SOC 2NoYes
HIPAANoYes
EU data residencyYesYes
Zero data retentionYesNot published

Performance

boat26.69 runs/s
Red Hat OpenShiftNot measured

There is no comparable measurement: OpenShift was not part of the hpc-sandbox-benchmarks run. boat did 26.69 runs per second on its Node.js build-and-test loop at 4 vCPU / 8 GB. On OpenShift the speed depends on the worker nodes you pick and how busy they are, so a fair comparison would need a run on your own cluster.

Node.js build-and-test loop at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, higher is better. Measured with the open hpc-sandbox-benchmarks suite. Red Hat OpenShift has no published run in this suite yet, so there is no like-for-like number to compare.

Pricing in five scenarios

Each bill is priced from the providers' public price lists by the open Battleships engine, with the cheapest plan that runs the scenario.

Scenarioboat, a monthRed Hat OpenShift, a month
One coding agent, workdays
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, 8 hours a day, 22 days a month, files kept between days
$20 · $20/mo$30 · OpenShift Dedicated · with limits
One agent that never stops
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, running 24/7 all month
$26 · $20/mo$125 · OpenShift Dedicated · with limits
50 agents in parallel
50 machines of 4 vCPU / 8 GB at once, 8-hour sessions, 1,100 sessions a month, Docker inside
$317 · $20/mo × 3 seats$1,505 · OpenShift Dedicated · with limits
Sandboxes for your users
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 30,000 sessions of 10 minutes a month, up to 300 at once
$200 · $100/mo × 2 seats$428 · OpenShift Dedicated · with limits
1,000 short jobs at once
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 1,000 at once, 3 minutes each, 200,000 jobs a month
$2,000 · $2000/mo · with limits$855 · OpenShift Dedicated · with limits

boat: Plans start at $20 a month, and the whole fee is usage credit. You pay per second while a sandbox runs, and a stopped sandbox costs nothing and keeps its disk.

Red Hat OpenShift: The table uses Red Hat's OpenShift Dedicated rate of $0.171 per 4 vCPU-hour, which Red Hat says is for illustration because customers are billed annually for at least a minimum worker node setup; 1- and 3-year terms cut it to $0.114 and $0.076. The cloud machines, disks and network underneath are billed on top by the cloud provider, and the free Developer Sandbox is a 30-day trial, not a way to run agents.

Limits in those scenarios

None of the scenarios fit OpenShift cleanly because it is a platform you size yourself, not a sandbox service: how many pods run at once depends on the worker nodes you pay for, and disk and egress prices come from your cloud. The agent fleet also needs Docker inside each machine, which a non-privileged pod does not have. On the OpenShift Dedicated rate the table uses, pods run until you delete them, so the always-on agent has no session cap; only the free Developer Sandbox deletes pods after 12 hours. boat's start limits bite at 1,000 short jobs at once: the $2000 plan queues starts above 90 per minute and runs out of daily starts.

ScenarioboatRed Hat OpenShift
One coding agent, workdaysNone that bite
  • different kind of product: batch / job platform
  • files survive a stop only in mounted volumes (PVCs): packages installed elsewhere reset
  • disk beyond 0 GiB: price unknown
  • egress price not published
One agent that never stopsNone that bite
  • different kind of product: batch / job platform
  • files survive a stop only in mounted volumes (PVCs): packages installed elsewhere reset
  • disk beyond 0 GiB: price unknown
  • egress price not published
50 agents in parallelNone that bite
  • missing Docker inside
  • different kind of product: batch / job platform
  • files survive a stop only in mounted volumes (PVCs): packages installed elsewhere reset
  • disk beyond 0 GiB: price unknown
Sandboxes for your usersNone that bite
  • different kind of product: batch / job platform
  • not confirmed: how many machines can run at once (you need 300; the typical published limit is 50)
  • disk beyond 0 GiB: price unknown
  • egress price not published
1,000 short jobs at once
  • max 2,400 starts/day (needs ~6,667)
  • max 600 starts/hour (needs ~1,000)
  • bursts above 90 starts/min are queued (a burst of 333 takes ~4 min to start)
  • different kind of product: batch / job platform
  • not confirmed: how many machines can run at once (you need 1,000; the typical published limit is 50)
  • disk beyond 0 GiB: price unknown
  • egress price not published

Which one should you use?

Use Red Hat OpenShift when

you already run it, or must keep workloads in your own data center or a non-EU cloud, and your agent tasks fit in headless pods without Docker, or need GPUs or Windows containers next to them.

  • It runs where you choose. Teams that must keep workloads in their own data center, or in a cloud region outside the EU, can run OpenShift there.
  • GPUs, Windows and more CPU types. Workloads that need GPU nodes, Windows Server containers or ARM64 machines can share one OpenShift cluster.
  • Network rules and a growing agent sandbox. Cluster admins can limit each project's outbound traffic by DNS name, IP range or port, and Red Hat is previewing an agent sandbox.

Use boat when

your agents do real work on a machine for hours: Docker, builds, tests, emulators and a browser, with a disk that keeps everything, URLs you can open and agents you drive from outside, with no cluster to run.

  • A whole machine, not a locked-down pod. Coding agents reach for docker build, docker compose and Android emulators all the time, and those fail in the pod. The workaround is a privileged SCC from a cluster admin, which gives code an agent wrote more power over a node shared with other pods.
  • The disk stays, with snapshots and fork. Without it, every new pod repeats the clone, the installs and the build. On OpenShift you can put work on a PVC and snapshot it, but packages installed elsewhere still reset, and there is no fork of a running pod.
  • Built for agents, not apps. On OpenShift you build the harness, the Routes and the key handling yourself, and Secrets arrive as files or environment variables inside the pod the agent controls, where one prompt injection can read them.

Questions people ask

Is boat cheaper than Red Hat OpenShift?

In four of the five scenarios on this page, yes, even before you add the cloud machines OpenShift runs on: one agent all month is $26 on boat against $125 for the OpenShift subscription alone. For 1,000 short jobs at once OpenShift comes out lower, at $855 against $2,000, if your cluster has room for them.

Can I run Docker inside an OpenShift pod?

Not under the default restricted SCC or Harbor's own SCC, which forbid privileged containers. A cluster admin can grant a privileged SCC, or you can build images with OpenShift's own build strategies instead. boat runs Docker inside every sandbox, along with systemd and /dev/kvm.

Does OpenShift have a sandbox for AI agents?

Red Hat lists a Red Hat build of Agent Sandbox as a Technology Preview in OpenShift sandboxed containers 1.13, with sandbox templates, claims and warm pools you install as an Operator on your cluster. Tools like Harbor instead run agent tasks as plain pods. boat is a managed service where each agent gets a full VM with coding agents included.

Can I use the free Developer Sandbox for agents?

It is meant for trying Red Hat products: it lasts 30 days, runs on a shared cluster, deletes pods after 12 consecutive hours and shuts Linux VMs down after one hour. That works for a quick test, not for agents that run every day.

Where does my data run?

boat runs only in the EU (Germany, Finland and France), with EU data residency and a zero data retention option. OpenShift runs wherever you put the cluster: your own data center, or a managed service on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud or IBM Cloud.

Is boat SOC 2 compliant?

SOC 2 is in progress. We're open about where we stand: live status at status.ascii.dev and our data retention policy at docs.boat.dev/data-retention.

Start a sandbox

Install the CLI, then run boat new.

7-day free trial

More comparisons