E2B vs Azure Container Apps Sandboxes

Both give each agent a microVM that suspends with its memory and wakes on the next request. E2B is an open-source agent cloud with a Linux desktop and a 24-hour session cap on Pro, while Azure's sandboxes live inside your Azure account, have no session cap and are headless.

The companies and products

E2B

E2B calls itself the AI agent cloud: an API that gives each agent session its own isolated Linux machine.

Every E2B sandbox is a Firecracker microVM that boots from a snapshot, so it starts fast and can be paused and resumed with its memory. You build custom sandboxes from templates based on a Docker image, and drive them from Python or JavaScript SDKs. It is built for teams that run many short code, data or agent jobs, and its runtime is open source.

Azure Container Apps Sandboxes

Azure Container Apps Sandboxes is a service inside Microsoft Azure that gives each agent or user an isolated microVM you create, suspend and resume through an SDK.

It is part of Azure Container Apps, the hyperscaler's serverless container platform, and lives in your Azure subscription as a sandbox group resource. Each sandbox boots from an OCI image or a snapshot, has its own kernel, and can be suspended with its memory and resumed in under a second. It is built for teams already on Azure that want stateful code execution with Azure networking, identity and billing.

Which use cases each one fits

For each use case, Battleships prices every sandbox provider on the same workload and sorts them from the cheapest monthly bill up. “16th cheapest of 367” means 15 of the other 366 providers run that workload, with every feature it needs, for less. “With limits” means the provider runs it but misses something, so it is listed after every full match. Open a use case for its whole ranking and what each provider misses.

Use case and its workloadE2B: price rankAzure Container Apps Sandboxes: price rankboat: price rank
Software factory
100 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 2,200 sessions of 8 h a month
E2B fits a software factory, but its 24-hour cap means long tasks pause and resume; Azure needs an image with Docker and has no desktop, and boat adds /dev/kvm and SSH.
16th cheapest of 367
$4,143 a month
288th of 367, with limits
$5,276 a month
3rd cheapest of 367
$634 a month
Always-on AI employees
50 machines 24/7 · 2 vCPU / 4 GB
An assistant that lives on its machine all month hits E2B's 24-hour cap, and on Azure it bills every running second; boat simply keeps running with a desktop and SSH.
51st of 366, with limits
$5,348 a month
302nd of 366, with limits
$6,544 a month
5th cheapest of 366
$657 a month
Code interpreter bursts
100 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 200,000 sessions of 1 min a month
Both are built for this: short code runs that suspend with their memory and wake on the next request, with Azure slightly cheaper in the table.
37th cheapest of 345
$421 a month
34th cheapest of 345
$354 a month
186th of 345, with limits
$2,000 a month
Sandboxes for your users
300 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 23 min a month
E2B and Azure sit side by side here, both suspending idle user sandboxes with memory; boat gives each user a bigger machine with hosting on up to 50 ports.
23rd cheapest of 361
$2,354 a month
22nd cheapest of 361
$2,260 a month
Cheapest of 361
$209 a month
RL rollouts
1,000 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 1,000,000 sessions of 3 min a month
E2B's memory forks and high start rate suit many short rollouts that branch from the same state, which is why it is near the top of this table.
2nd cheapest of 360
$9,384 a month
153rd of 360, with limits
$10,740 a month
34th of 360, with limits
$2,000 a month
Agent evals
250 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 15,000 sessions of 20 min a month
78th cheapest of 364
$1,975 a month
75th cheapest of 364
$1,728 a month
10th cheapest of 364
$200 a month
CI runners
40 at once · 8 vCPU / 16 GB · 6,000 sessions of 12 min a month
Azure fits CI runners better than E2B, but neither documents nested virtualization for Android or VM builds, which boat has with /dev/kvm.
337th of 377, with limits
$1,429 a month
103rd cheapest of 377
$1,046 a month
4th cheapest of 377
$86 a month
24/7 dev boxes
1 machine 24/7 · 4 vCPU / 8 GB
192nd of 368, with limits
$358 a month
322nd of 368, with limits
$262 a month
18th cheapest of 368
$26 a month
Computer-use agents
50 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 20,000 sessions of 15 min a month
E2B ships a Linux desktop for computer use and Azure's sandboxes are headless; boat streams its desktop at 60fps and can be embedded in your app.
32nd cheapest of 369
$1,342 a month
279th of 369, with limits
$1,573 a month
6th cheapest of 369
$200 a month
Browser-use agents
50 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 10 min a month
100th of 367, with limits
$746 a month
288th of 367, with limits
$795 a month
7th cheapest of 367
$200 a month
Scraping & bots (startup scale)
50 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 100,000 sessions of 3 min a month
57th cheapest of 346
$554 a month
284th of 346, with limits
$561 a month
6th cheapest of 346
$90 a month
Mass scraping & bots (undetectable)
1,000 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 3,000,000 sessions of 2 min a month
227th of 338, with limits
$9,223 a month
239th of 338, with limits
$10,956 a month
71st of 338, with limits
$1,800 a month
Parallel red teaming
200 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 5,000 sessions of 30 min a month
E2B fits parallel red teaming well, while Azure's headless sandboxes are a compromise; boat gives each run a desktop, a browser and a fast machine.
11th cheapest of 360
$1,043 a month
278th of 360, with limits
$517 a month
2nd cheapest of 360
$200 a month
GPU eval jobs
10 at once · 8 vCPU / 32 GB · 500 sessions of 30 min a month
Can't run itCan't run itCan't run it
macOS agents
5 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 1,000 sessions of 20 min a month
Can't run itCan't run itCan't run it

Key features

FeatureE2BAzure Container Apps Sandboxesboat
IsolationFirecracker microVM with its own kernelMicroVM per sandbox with its own kernelFull VM with its own kernel on dedicated AMD Ryzen 9 9950X hosts
CPU benchmark (4 vCPU / 8 GB)12.61 runs/sNot measured26.69 runs/s
Session lengthUp to 1 hour on Hobby, 24 hours on Pro; pausing resets the clockNo cap; a sandbox runs until it is stopped or auto-suspends when idleNo cap on paid plans; you set the time to live
Machine size1 to 8 vCPU and up to 8 GiB self-serve, more on requestTiers up to 4 cores / 8 GB; up to 16 vCPU / 32 GB by APIUp to 16 vCPU / 32 GB on the $100 plan and above
Pause and resumeSaves memory and disk; resume takes about 1 second with processes runningSuspends with memory and disk; resume in under a second with processes runningDisk is saved every minute and on stop; resume boots the machine again
Wake on requestA paused sandbox can resume on the next HTTP request or SDK callAuto-suspends after an idle timeout; network traffic or a start command brings it backAuto-stop timer you set; a stopped sandbox is started by API
ForkFork a running sandbox with its memory, up to 20 copies per callSnapshot a running sandbox with its memory and create new sandboxes from itFork a running sandbox with its disk
Docker and nested virtualizationDocker inside; nested virtualization not supportedDocker depends on the image (azure-dev ships it); nested virtualization not documentedDocker, systemd and root on every sandbox, plus /dev/kvm for Android emulators and VMs
Desktop and computer useLinux desktop for computer-use agentsHeadless; no desktop or managed browserLinux desktop streamed at 60fps, Chromium and computer-use tools preinstalled
Inbound accessHTTPS URL per port, public by default unless you turn on a token; no dedicated IPPublic HTTPS routes per published port; private endpoint from your VNet at extra cost; no public IPHTTPS URLs for up to 50 ports, token-protected by default; raw TCP; dedicated IPv4 or IPv6
Outbound rulesAllow and deny lists by IP, CIDR or domainEgress policy with allow, deny, rewrite and header rules by host, path and method; VNet integrationOpen internet, no provider-side allowlist
Coding agents and keysTemplates for many agents run through the command API; secrets injected into outbound HTTPS headers (private beta)Copilot CLI and Claude Code images run through the exec API; their tokens are injected into the sandbox at startSeven agents preinstalled with a prompt, steer and events API; credentials proxy keeps model and any HTTPS API keys outside
RegionsUS by default; EU and APAC on Pro and above, enabled by support40 Azure regions, 9 of them in the EUEU only (Germany, Finland, France)
Where it runsE2B's cloud, an open-source runtime you can self-host, or your own cloud on EnterpriseInside your Azure subscription, with Entra ID accounts onlyboat's cloud; sign in with GitHub, Google or an emailed code
Every feature Battleships tracks (43)
FeatureE2BAzure Container Apps Sandboxesboat
Full VM (own kernel)YesYesYes
Docker insideYesYesYes
Nested virtualizationNoNoYes
RootYesYesYes
SystemdYesYesYes
Desktop GUIYesNoYes
BrowserYesNoYes
Computer-use APIYesNoYes
SSHYesNoYes
Persistent diskYesYesYes
Pause/resumeYesYesYes
Automatic snapshotsYesYesYes
Fork/cloneYesYesYes
Live fork (no pause)YesYesYes
Memory forkYesYesNo
Custom image (Docker or snapshot)YesYesYes
≥24 h sessionsYesYesYes
Idle auto-stopYesYesNo
Wake on requestYesYesNo
HTTPS preview URLsYesYesYes
Raw TCP inboundNoNoYes
Public IPv4NoNoNo
Egress allowlistYesYesNo
Secret proxyYesYesYes
Secret proxy for any APIYesYesYes
Preinstalled agentsYesYesYes
Agent harness APINoNoYes
MCP serverYesNoNo
GPUNoNoNo
WindowsNoNoNo
Arm64NoNoNo
Self-hostingYesNoNo
BYOCYesNoNo
Open sourceYesNoNo
Scoped API keysNot publishedNot publishedYes
Spend limitsYesYesYes
Usage per sandbox (API)NoYesYes
Audit logsNot publishedYesNo
SSONoYesNo
SOC 2YesYesNo
HIPAAYesYesNo
EU data residencyYesYesYes
Zero data retentionNot publishedNot publishedYes

Performance

E2B12.61 runs/s
Azure Container Apps SandboxesNot measured
boat26.69 runs/s

E2B and boat were measured in the same StarSling hpc-sandbox-benchmarks run, a Node.js build-and-test loop at 4 vCPU / 8 GB: boat did 26.69 runs per second and E2B did 12.61, so boat does about twice the CPU work in the same time. Azure Container Apps Sandboxes has no comparable measurement yet, so this page makes no speed claim for it.

Node.js build-and-test loop at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, higher is better. Measured with the open hpc-sandbox-benchmarks suite. Azure Container Apps Sandboxes has no published run in this suite yet, so there is no like-for-like number to compare.

Pricing in five scenarios

Each bill is priced from the providers' public price lists by the open Battleships engine, with the cheapest plan that runs the scenario.

ScenarioE2B, a monthAzure Container Apps Sandboxes, a monthboat, a month
One coding agent, workdays
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, 8 hours a day, 22 days a month, files kept between days
$202 · Pro$68 · Pay-as-you-go$20 · $20/mo
One agent that never stops
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, running 24/7 all month
$368 · Pro · with limits$262 · Pay-as-you-go · with limits$26 · $20/mo
50 agents in parallel
50 machines of 4 vCPU / 8 GB at once, 8-hour sessions, 1,100 sessions a month, Docker inside
$2,773 · Pro$3,421 · Pay-as-you-go$317 · $20/mo × 3 seats
Sandboxes for your users
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 30,000 sessions of 10 minutes a month, up to 300 at once
$1,395 · Pro+ (600 concurrent)$989 · Pay-as-you-go$200 · $100/mo × 2 seats
1,000 short jobs at once
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 1,000 at once, 3 minutes each, 200,000 jobs a month
$2,797 · Pro++ (1,100 concurrent)$2,148 · Pay-as-you-go$2,000 · $2000/mo · with limits

E2B: E2B bills per second for the vCPU and RAM you set, idle time included, until you pause or kill the sandbox. Pro costs $150 a month for higher limits with no usage credit, and more concurrency costs $500 a month per 500 slots.

Azure Container Apps Sandboxes: Azure bills per second on the Container Apps Consumption meters for the sandbox's tier while it runs, including the idle time before auto-suspend (5 minutes by default). There is no plan fee, and some regions such as West Europe charge more per second.

Azure Container Apps Sandboxes: Plans start at $20 a month, and the whole fee is usage credit. You pay per second while a sandbox runs, and a stopped sandbox costs nothing and keeps its disk.

Limits in those scenarios

E2B caps a session at 24 hours on Pro, so it does not fit the always-on scenario, and its Pro plan includes 20 GiB of disk. Azure has no session cap but bills every running second, so always-on only gets close with a 3-year commitment, and its default quota of 500 active cores caps a fleet until support raises it. For 1,000 short jobs at once, E2B Pro++ queues bursts above 300 starts a minute, Azure starts them from prewarmed pools, and boat's $2,000 plan caps starts per hour and per day.

ScenarioE2BAzure Container Apps Sandboxesboat
One coding agent, workdays
  • disk beyond 20 GiB: price unknown
  • egress price not published
None that biteNone that bite
One agent that never stops
  • Pro: sessions capped at 24 h
  • disk beyond 20 GiB: price unknown
  • egress price not published
  • 3-year commitment
None that bite
50 agents in parallel
  • egress price not published
None that biteNone that bite
Sandboxes for your users
  • egress price not published
None that biteNone that bite
1,000 short jobs at once
  • egress price not published
  • bursts above 300 starts/min are queued (a burst of 333 takes ~2 min to start)
None that bite
  • max 2,400 starts/day (needs ~6,667)
  • max 600 starts/hour (needs ~1,000)
  • bursts above 90 starts/min are queued (a burst of 333 takes ~4 min to start)

Which one should you use?

Use E2B when

you want an open-source runtime you can self-host, a desktop for computer-use agents, or memory forks for many short rollouts.

  • A desktop for computer-use agents. E2B gives each sandbox a Linux desktop for computer-use agents, which Azure's headless sandboxes do not have.
  • Open source and your own cloud. Its runtime is Apache-2.0 and runs on your own KVM host, and Enterprise can run it in your AWS, GCP or Azure account.
  • Built for many short rollouts. Memory forks of a running sandbox, up to 20 per call, suit RL rollouts that branch from the same state.

Use Azure Container Apps Sandboxes when

your team already runs on Azure and wants stateful sandboxes with no session cap, strict egress rules and 40 regions.

  • No session cap. A sandbox keeps running until you stop it or it suspends when idle, so long tasks are never cut off at 24 hours.
  • Fine-grained outbound rules. Its egress policy can allow, deny or rewrite each outbound request by host, path and method, and join your Azure VNets.
  • Inside Azure, in 40 regions. Teams already on Azure get Entra ID, Azure billing and their own networks, in 40 regions on six continents.

Where boat fits

E2B and Azure are both strongest at short stateful jobs that suspend with their memory. If your agents do hours of real work, with installs, builds, Docker, emulators and a browser, boat gives each one a whole fast computer with agents and keys built in.

A whole machine with /dev/kvm and SSH

Neither E2B nor Azure offers nested virtualization, so Android emulators and VMs cannot start. Azure has no SSH and E2B has no raw TCP or dedicated IP, so remote editors and database clients need workarounds.

Twice the CPU, no session cap

boat did 26.69 runs per second on the CPU benchmark and E2B did 12.61, so every build waits about twice as long on E2B. E2B also stops at 24 hours on Pro, and your code must pause and resume it.

Agents, a 60fps desktop and keys kept outside

On Azure a browser agent needs you to build a display and streaming stack yourself, and its agent tokens sit inside the sandbox. boat ships seven agents, a 60fps desktop and a credentials proxy for any HTTPS API.

Use boat when your agents need a whole fast computer for hours: SSH, Docker, /dev/kvm, a 60fps desktop and a browser, with coding agents and a credentials proxy built in. Compare it one to one: boat vs E2B and boat vs Azure Container Apps Sandboxes.

Questions people ask

Is E2B cheaper than Azure Container Apps Sandboxes?

In four of the five scenarios on this page Azure costs less, for example $68 a month against $202 for one coding agent on workdays. E2B is cheaper for 50 agents in parallel, at $2,773 a month against $3,421. boat costs less than both in every scenario it fits.

Which is faster, E2B or Azure Container Apps Sandboxes?

Azure has not been measured on the same CPU test, so there is no fair answer yet. E2B did 12.61 runs per second at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, and boat did 26.69 in the same run.

Can E2B and Azure sandboxes run Docker?

E2B runs Docker inside the sandbox. On Azure it depends on the image: azure-dev ships Docker on systemd, while the default ubuntu image has only Buildah. Neither offers nested virtualization; boat runs Docker everywhere and exposes /dev/kvm.

Can a sandbox run for days on E2B or Azure?

Not in one E2B session: it stops after 24 hours on Pro and 1 hour on Hobby, though pausing resets the clock. Azure documents no session cap, and boat has none on paid plans.

Which one has a desktop for computer-use agents?

E2B has a Linux desktop for computer use, while Azure's sandboxes are headless with no managed browser. boat streams a Linux desktop at 60fps with Chromium preinstalled.

Do I need an Azure account for Azure Container Apps Sandboxes?

Yes. It needs an Azure subscription, a Microsoft Entra ID account and the Container Apps SandboxGroup Data Owner role. boat signs you in with GitHub, Google or an emailed code.

Try boat

Install the CLI, then run boat new.

7-day free trial

More comparisons