E2B vs Namespace

E2B is an agent sandbox API: each job gets a Firecracker microVM that starts fast and can pause and resume with its memory. Namespace is a build and dev platform: CI runners, build caches and Devboxes on Linux, macOS and Windows, which coding agents can also use.

The companies and products

E2B

E2B calls itself the AI agent cloud: an API that gives each agent session its own isolated Linux machine.

Every E2B sandbox is a Firecracker microVM that boots from a snapshot, so it starts fast and can be paused and resumed with its memory. You build custom sandboxes from templates based on a Docker image, and drive them from Python or JavaScript SDKs. It is built for teams that run many short code, data or agent jobs, and its runtime is open source.

Namespace

Namespace is a dev platform for fast builds, tests and coding environments: CI runners, build caches and Devboxes, on its own hardware.

Most of Namespace is CI: a faster drop-in for GitHub Actions runners, with Docker, Bazel, Turborepo and Nix caching. Its Devboxes are remote Linux and macOS machines with persistent storage, made for people and AI coding agents, and they also host sessions for Claude Managed Agents, Cursor Cloud Agents and Devin. It is a different kind of product from boat, so this page compares the part where they overlap: a machine an agent works on.

Which use cases each one fits

For each use case, Battleships prices every sandbox provider on the same workload and sorts them from the cheapest monthly bill up. “16th cheapest of 367” means 15 of the other 366 providers run that workload, with every feature it needs, for less. “With limits” means the provider runs it but misses something, so it is listed after every full match. Open a use case for its whole ranking and what each provider misses.

Use case and its workloadE2B: price rankNamespace: price rankboat: price rank
Software factory
100 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 2,200 sessions of 8 h a month
E2B fits fully while a Namespace Devbox is a compromise because it is shut down after at most 24 hours; boat fits too, with no session cap and /dev/kvm.
16th cheapest of 367
$4,143 a month
39th of 367, with limits
$3,495 a month
3rd cheapest of 367
$634 a month
Always-on AI employees
50 machines 24/7 · 2 vCPU / 4 GB
Both are a compromise for an assistant that never stops: E2B ends a session after 24 hours on Pro and a Namespace Devbox after at most 24 hours; boat has no session cap on paid plans.
51st of 366, with limits
$5,348 a month
303rd of 366, with limits
$6,645 a month
5th cheapest of 366
$657 a month
Code interpreter bursts
100 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 200,000 sessions of 1 min a month
E2B is built for this: short code runs that start fast, pause with their memory and wake on the next request, while Namespace is a compromise here.
37th cheapest of 345
$421 a month
247th of 345, with limits
$250 a month
186th of 345, with limits
$2,000 a month
Sandboxes for your users
300 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 23 min a month
E2B fits fully and can wake a paused sandbox on the next request, Namespace is a compromise, and boat ranks first with a bigger, faster machine and hosting built in.
23rd cheapest of 361
$2,354 a month
284th of 361, with limits
$2,068 a month
Cheapest of 361
$209 a month
RL rollouts
1,000 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 1,000,000 sessions of 3 min a month
E2B ranks 2nd here: memory forks and a high start rate suit many short rollouts that branch from the same state.
2nd cheapest of 360
$9,384 a month
356th of 360, with limits
$9,012 a month
34th of 360, with limits
$2,000 a month
Agent evals
250 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 15,000 sessions of 20 min a month
78th cheapest of 364
$1,975 a month
282nd of 364, with limits
$1,043 a month
10th cheapest of 364
$200 a month
CI runners
40 at once · 8 vCPU / 16 GB · 6,000 sessions of 12 min a month
CI runners are Namespace's main product, with caches for Docker, Bazel and more; E2B is a compromise because it has no nested virtualization, and boat runs CI jobs on full VMs with /dev/kvm.
337th of 377, with limits
$1,429 a month
80th cheapest of 377
$765 a month
4th cheapest of 377
$86 a month
24/7 dev boxes
1 machine 24/7 · 4 vCPU / 8 GB
192nd of 368, with limits
$358 a month
126th of 368, with limits
$168 a month
18th cheapest of 368
$26 a month
Computer-use agents
50 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 20,000 sessions of 15 min a month
E2B has a Linux desktop for computer use, while Namespace's screenshot and click API works on macOS Devboxes only; boat streams a 60fps Linux desktop you can embed.
32nd cheapest of 369
$1,342 a month
67th of 369, with limits
$982 a month
6th cheapest of 369
$200 a month
Browser-use agents
50 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 10 min a month
100th of 367, with limits
$746 a month
285th of 367, with limits
$789 a month
7th cheapest of 367
$200 a month
Scraping & bots (startup scale)
50 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 100,000 sessions of 3 min a month
57th cheapest of 346
$554 a month
259th of 346, with limits
$332 a month
6th cheapest of 346
$90 a month
Mass scraping & bots (undetectable)
1,000 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 3,000,000 sessions of 2 min a month
227th of 338, with limits
$9,223 a month
226th of 338, with limits
$9,012 a month
71st of 338, with limits
$1,800 a month
Parallel red teaming
200 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 5,000 sessions of 30 min a month
11th cheapest of 360
$1,043 a month
242nd of 360, with limits
$339 a month
2nd cheapest of 360
$200 a month
GPU eval jobs
10 at once · 8 vCPU / 32 GB · 500 sessions of 30 min a month
Can't run itCan't run itCan't run it
macOS agents
5 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 1,000 sessions of 20 min a month
Only Namespace fits: it runs macOS on Apple Silicon, while E2B and boat run Linux only.
Can't run it6th cheapest of 36
$1,205 a month
Can't run it

Key features

FeatureE2BNamespaceboat
IsolationFirecracker microVM with its own kernelLinux Devboxes run from a container image on Namespace's own hardware; the docs do not say if each has its own kernelFull VM with its own kernel on dedicated AMD Ryzen 9 9950X hosts
CPU speed (Node.js build-and-test, 4 vCPU / 8 GB)12.61 runs/s21.79 runs/s26.69 runs/s
How long a session can run1 hour on Hobby, 24 hours on Pro; pausing resets the clockDevboxes stop after 4, 5 or 24 hours by plan, even while you work; 24 hours at mostNo session cap on paid plans; you set the time to live
Pause and resumeSaves memory and disk; resumes in about 1 second with processes still runningDevboxes stop when idle and start again when you connect; compute instances can suspend with RAM keptDisk saved every minute and on stop; resume boots the machine again
ForkFork a running sandbox with its memory, up to 20 copies per callNo forkFork a running sandbox with its disk
Docker and nested virtualizationDocker inside; nested virtualization not supportedDocker in Linux Devboxes; /dev/kvm on Linux compute instancesDocker, root, systemd and /dev/kvm on every machine
Desktop and computer useLinux desktop for computer useScreenshot and click API on macOS Devboxes only; VNC and RDP for compute instances60fps Linux desktop and Chromium, computer use and browser control, embeddable stream
Reaching the sandboxHTTPS URL per port, public unless you turn on a token; no dedicated IPHTTPS URLs that need a Namespace login; TCP through a CLI port-forward; no public IPHTTPS URLs for up to 50 ports, token-protected; raw TCP; dedicated IPv4 or IPv6
Outbound rulesAllow and deny lists by IP, CIDR or domainEgress policies by domain: block, advisory or allowOpen internet, no provider-side allowlist
Keeping API keys out of the sandboxSecrets injected into outbound HTTPS headers (private beta)Egress rules inject a header from Namespace Vault, outside the workloadCredentials proxy for model providers and any HTTPS API; switch a credential to another account when credits run out
Coding agentsTemplates and guides for many agents, run through the command APIHosts Claude Managed Agents, Cursor and Devin sessions; an MCP server lets your agent create DevboxesSeven agents preinstalled, driven from outside with a prompt, steer and events API
Operating systemsLinux onlyLinux, macOS on Apple Silicon, and Windows on Team plans and upLinux only; Wine for Windows apps
RegionsUS by default; EU and APAC on Pro and above through supportSeveral regions, nearest by default; region-exclusive residency on EnterpriseEU only (Germany, Finland, France)
Self-hostingOpen-source runtime (Apache-2.0), plus your own cloud on EnterpriseNoNo
Every feature Battleships tracks (43)
FeatureE2BNamespaceboat
Full VM (own kernel)YesYesYes
Docker insideYesYesYes
Nested virtualizationNoYesYes
RootYesYesYes
SystemdYesNot publishedYes
Desktop GUIYesYesYes
BrowserYesNoYes
Computer-use APIYesYesYes
SSHYesYesYes
Persistent diskYesYesYes
Pause/resumeYesYesYes
Automatic snapshotsYesYesYes
Fork/cloneYesNoYes
Live fork (no pause)YesNoYes
Memory forkYesNoNo
Custom image (Docker or snapshot)YesYesYes
≥24 h sessionsYesYesYes
Idle auto-stopYesYesNo
Wake on requestYesYesNo
HTTPS preview URLsYesYesYes
Raw TCP inboundNoYesYes
Public IPv4NoNoNo
Egress allowlistYesYesNo
Secret proxyYesYesYes
Secret proxy for any APIYesYesYes
Preinstalled agentsYesYesYes
Agent harness APINoNoYes
MCP serverYesYesNo
GPUNoNoNo
WindowsNoYesNo
Arm64NoYesNo
Self-hostingYesNoNo
BYOCYesNoNo
Open sourceYesNoNo
Scoped API keysNot publishedNot publishedYes
Spend limitsYesYesYes
Usage per sandbox (API)NoNoYes
Audit logsNot publishedYesNo
SSONoYesNo
SOC 2YesYesNo
HIPAAYesNoNo
EU data residencyYesYesYes
Zero data retentionNot publishedNot publishedYes

Performance

E2B12.61 runs/s
Namespace21.79 runs/s
boat26.69 runs/s

In the same StarSling hpc-sandbox-benchmarks run at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, boat did 26.69 Node.js build-and-test runs per second, Namespace did 21.79 and E2B did 12.61. So Namespace does about 1.7 times the CPU work of E2B, and boat about twice E2B and a fifth more than Namespace. A Namespace Devbox's vCPU count is a ceiling it can boost to, not a guaranteed share.

Node.js build-and-test loop at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, higher is better. Measured with the open hpc-sandbox-benchmarks suite. Namespace measured on: Linux compute instance (unit-minutes, PAYG/overage $0.0015).

Pricing in five scenarios

Each bill is priced from the providers' public price lists by the open Battleships engine, with the cheapest plan that runs the scenario.

ScenarioE2B, a monthNamespace, a monthboat, a month
One coding agent, workdays
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, 8 hours a day, 22 days a month, files kept between days
$202 · Pro$50 · Devbox (pay as you go)$20 · $20/mo
One agent that never stops
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, running 24/7 all month
$368 · Pro · with limits$176 · Devbox (pay as you go) · with limits$26 · $20/mo
50 agents in parallel
50 machines of 4 vCPU / 8 GB at once, 8-hour sessions, 1,100 sessions a month, Docker inside
$2,773 · Pro$2,198 · Devbox (pay as you go)$317 · $20/mo × 3 seats
Sandboxes for your users
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 30,000 sessions of 10 minutes a month, up to 300 at once
$1,395 · Pro+ (600 concurrent)$1,214 · Devbox (pay as you go)$200 · $100/mo × 2 seats
1,000 short jobs at once
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 1,000 at once, 3 minutes each, 200,000 jobs a month
$2,797 · Pro++ (1,100 concurrent)$3,237 · Devbox (pay as you go)$2,000 · $2000/mo · with limits

E2B: E2B bills per second for the vCPU and RAM you set, idle time included, until you pause or kill the sandbox. Pro costs $150 a month for higher limits with no usage credit, and more concurrency costs $500 a month per 500 slots.

Namespace: Namespace bills Devboxes in Devbox Minutes at $0.004 each, pay as you go on every plan; a 4 vCPU / 8 GB Devbox uses one a minute. Team and Business plan minutes cover runners and instances, not Devboxes, and stored files cost $0.20 per GB-month.

Namespace: Plans start at $20 a month and the whole fee is usage credit, spent per second while a sandbox runs. A stopped sandbox costs nothing and keeps its disk.

Limits in those scenarios

Time is the limit that bites on both: E2B Pro caps a session at 24 hours and a Namespace Devbox stops after at most 24, so neither fits the agent that never stops without restarts. On Namespace's Developer or Team plans even one 8-hour workday session hits the 4 or 5 hour limit, and E2B Pro includes only 20 GiB of disk, with no published price for more. For 1,000 short jobs at once both fit, though E2B queues bursts above 300 starts a minute; boat's start limits make that scenario a poor fit. Neither E2B nor Namespace publishes an egress price.

ScenarioE2BNamespaceboat
One coding agent, workdays
  • disk beyond 20 GiB: price unknown
  • egress price not published
  • egress price not published
None that bite
One agent that never stops
  • Pro: sessions capped at 24 h
  • disk beyond 20 GiB: price unknown
  • egress price not published
  • sessions end after 24 h: needs restarts to run 24/7
  • egress price not published
None that bite
50 agents in parallel
  • egress price not published
  • egress price not published
None that bite
Sandboxes for your users
  • egress price not published
  • egress price not published
None that bite
1,000 short jobs at once
  • egress price not published
  • bursts above 300 starts/min are queued (a burst of 333 takes ~2 min to start)
  • egress price not published
  • max 2,400 starts/day (needs ~6,667)
  • max 600 starts/hour (needs ~1,000)
  • bursts above 90 starts/min are queued (a burst of 333 takes ~4 min to start)

Which one should you use?

Use E2B when

you run many short jobs that pause between requests, need memory forks for rollouts, or want an open-source runtime in your own cloud.

  • Memory pause and wake on request. For short jobs that sleep between requests, a paused E2B sandbox wakes on the next call in about a second, processes still running.
  • Memory forks for branching work. For RL rollouts and parallel tries, E2B forks a running sandbox with its memory, up to 20 copies per call.
  • Open source and your own cloud. For teams that want control of the stack, the runtime is Apache-2.0 and Enterprise can run it in your AWS, GCP or Azure.

Use Namespace when

you need macOS or Windows machines, faster GitHub Actions runners with build caches, or Devboxes for people that stop when idle.

  • macOS and Windows. For agents that build iOS or Mac apps or test on Windows, Namespace runs macOS on Apple Silicon and Windows machines.
  • CI runners and build caches. For faster GitHub Actions, Namespace is a drop-in runner with Docker, Bazel, Turborepo and Nix caching.
  • Devboxes that stop when idle. For dev machines people share with agents, a Devbox stops after an idle timeout and starts again when you connect.

Where boat fits

If what you are really running is coding agents that work for hours on Linux, both E2B and Namespace stop them within a day. boat gives each agent a full VM with no session cap on paid plans, /dev/kvm, a faster CPU, and the agents and their keys built in.

No clock on the session

E2B ends a session after 24 hours on Pro, so your code must pause and resume it. A Namespace Devbox shuts down after 4, 5 or 24 hours even while it works. On boat's paid plans a sandbox runs as long as the work does.

A faster, fuller machine

boat did 26.69 runs per second against 12.61 on E2B and 21.79 on Namespace, so builds and tests wait less. E2B has no nested virtualization for Android emulators or VMs; every boat machine has /dev/kvm, Docker and systemd.

Agents and keys built in

On E2B you run agents through its command API, and on Namespace through a partner service or your own code. boat preinstalls seven agents you drive from outside, and its credentials proxy keeps real keys out of the sandbox.

Use boat when your agents work on Linux for hours or days: a full, faster VM with no session cap, Docker and /dev/kvm, a 60fps desktop, and coding agents you drive from outside. Compare it one to one: boat vs E2B and boat vs Namespace.

Questions people ask

Is E2B cheaper than Namespace?

Namespace costs less in four of the five scenarios we priced: one coding agent on workdays is $202 a month on E2B and $50 on Namespace, and 50 agents in parallel are $2,773 against $2,198. E2B is cheaper for 1,000 short jobs at once, at $2,797 against $3,237. boat comes to $20 and $317 a month for the first two.

Which is faster, E2B or Namespace?

On the same CPU benchmark at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, Namespace did 21.79 runs per second and E2B did 12.61, so Namespace is about 1.7 times as fast. boat did 26.69. This measures CPU work only, not start time.

Can E2B and Namespace run Docker?

Both run Docker inside. E2B does not support nested virtualization, so Android emulators and VMs will not start, while Namespace offers /dev/kvm on Linux compute instances. boat has Docker, systemd and /dev/kvm on every machine.

How long can a session run on E2B or Namespace?

E2B stops a sandbox after 1 hour on Hobby and 24 hours on Pro, though pausing resets the clock. A Namespace Devbox stops after 4, 5 or 24 hours by plan, even while you work, and 24 hours is the most support can set. boat has no session cap on paid plans.

Do E2B or Namespace run macOS or Windows?

Namespace does: macOS on Apple M4 Pro and M5 Max chips, and Windows on Team plans and up. E2B runs Linux only, and so does boat, with Wine for Windows apps.

Where do E2B, Namespace and boat run?

E2B runs in the US by default, with EU and APAC on Pro and above through support. Namespace runs in several regions and keeps a workload in one region only on Enterprise. boat runs only in the EU, in Germany, Finland and France.

Try boat

Install the CLI, then run boat new.

7-day free trial

More comparisons