exe.dev vs Together Code Sandbox

exe.dev rents Linux VMs you keep, reach over SSH and boot from your own Docker image, in nine regions. Together Code Sandbox starts VMs from snapshots through an SDK, can save their memory when they end, and must be turned on for your organization by Together.

The companies and products

exe.dev

exe.dev, made by Bold Software, Inc., rents Linux VMs for developers and AI agents that you reach over SSH and HTTPS.

You reserve a pool of vCPUs and memory, and your VMs share it; you can also start standalone VMs billed by the second. Each VM is KVM-isolated (they use Cloud Hypervisor), boots from a container image in about two seconds, and has root, systemd and Docker. It comes with Claude Code, Codex, Pi and exe.dev's own Shelley agent, and is aimed at developers who want a persistent dev box or a sandbox for their agents.

Together Code Sandbox

Together AI is a cloud for running and training AI models, and Code Sandbox is its product for running code in isolated VMs.

You build a snapshot from a Docker image or Dockerfile on Together's builder, then start sandboxes from it and run commands and file operations through the together-sandbox SDK or CLI. When a sandbox ends you can save its disk, and its memory too, as a new snapshot to start more sandboxes from. It is aimed at model-generated code, agent tool calls and reinforcement learning rollouts, and it must be enabled for your organization by Together. Together also sells Code Interpreter, a separate API that runs Python code in short sessions.

Which use cases each one fits

For each use case, Battleships prices every sandbox provider on the same workload and sorts them from the cheapest monthly bill up. “15th cheapest of 366” means 14 of the other 365 providers run that workload, with every feature it needs, for less. “With limits” means the provider runs it but misses something, so it is listed after every full match. Open a use case for its whole ranking and what each provider misses.

Use case and its workloadexe.dev: price rankTogether Code Sandbox: price rankboat: price rank
Software factory
100 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 2,200 sessions of 8 h a month
253rd of 367, with limits
$3,701 a month
65th of 367, with limits
$528 a month
3rd cheapest of 367
$634 a month
Always-on AI employees
50 machines 24/7 · 2 vCPU / 4 GB
exe.dev fits an always-on assistant fully, with a VM that runs until you stop it; Together sandboxes have no idle detection or wake on request, so your backend starts and stops them.
15th cheapest of 366
$3,833 a month
152nd of 366, with limits
$1,095 a month
5th cheapest of 366
$657 a month
Code interpreter bursts
100 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 200,000 sessions of 1 min a month
Together's Code Interpreter runs short Python sessions billed per 60 minutes, and exe.dev is not built for many tiny runs, so both are compromises here.
235th of 345, with limits
$175 a month
326th of 345, with limits
$2,190 a month
186th of 345, with limits
$2,000 a month
Sandboxes for your users
300 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 23 min a month
Neither fits sandboxes for your users: exe.dev Personal stops at 50 VMs at once, and every Together port is public; boat fits with token-protected HTTPS URLs.
257th of 361, with limits
$1,226 a month
234th of 361, with limits
$900 a month
Cheapest of 361
$209 a month
RL rollouts
1,000 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 1,000,000 sessions of 3 min a month
Together can save a sandbox with its memory and start many copies from it, which suits rollouts that branch from one warm state; boat ranks far higher here on the generated table.
265th of 360, with limits
$5,250 a month
315th of 360, with limits
$21,900 a month
34th of 360, with limits
$2,000 a month
Agent evals
250 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 15,000 sessions of 20 min a month
Together documents a Harbor integration for agent evals, while exe.dev drives only its Shelley agent through the API; boat ships the agents with an API to prompt, steer and follow each run.
283rd of 364, with limits
$1,050 a month
258th of 364, with limits
$450 a month
10th cheapest of 364
$200 a month
CI runners
40 at once · 8 vCPU / 16 GB · 6,000 sessions of 12 min a month
exe.dev standalone VMs bill per second and pools bill whether used or not; Together's VMs are gated, and boat bills per second only while a sandbox runs.
288th of 377, with limits
$504 a month
251st of 377, with limits
$180 a month
4th cheapest of 377
$86 a month
24/7 dev boxes
1 machine 24/7 · 4 vCPU / 8 GB
exe.dev is a real 24/7 dev box with SSH and a disk that lasts; Together has no SSH, and boat matches exe.dev here and adds a desktop in the browser.
25th cheapest of 368
$35 a month
210th of 368, with limits
$22 a month
18th cheapest of 368
$26 a month
Computer-use agents
50 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 20,000 sessions of 15 min a month
Computer-use agents need a screen, and neither exe.dev nor Together has one; boat streams a 60fps desktop with Chromium.
240th of 369, with limits
$1,055 a month
184th of 369, with limits
$600 a month
6th cheapest of 369
$200 a month
Browser-use agents
50 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 10 min a month
130th of 367, with limits
$530 a month
301st of 367, with limits
$900 a month
7th cheapest of 367
$200 a month
Scraping & bots (startup scale)
50 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 100,000 sessions of 3 min a month
124th of 346, with limits
$278 a month
219th of 346, with limits
$180 a month
6th cheapest of 346
$90 a month
Mass scraping & bots (undetectable)
1,000 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 3,000,000 sessions of 2 min a month
166th of 338, with limits
$5,490 a month
124th of 338, with limits
$3,600 a month
71st of 338, with limits
$1,800 a month
Parallel red teaming
200 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 5,000 sessions of 30 min a month
60th of 360, with limits
$263 a month
167th of 360, with limits
$150 a month
2nd cheapest of 360
$200 a month
GPU eval jobs
10 at once · 8 vCPU / 32 GB · 500 sessions of 30 min a month
Can't run itCan't run itCan't run it
macOS agents
5 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 1,000 sessions of 20 min a month
Can't run itCan't run itCan't run it

Key features

Featureexe.devTogether Code Sandboxboat
IsolationKVM VM with Cloud Hypervisor; you can't choose the kernelA VM per sandbox on Together's infrastructureFull VM with its own kernel on dedicated AMD Ryzen 9 9950X hosts
Getting startedSign up for a Personal or Work planThe SDK and CLI must be enabled for your organization by TogetherSign up and start a sandbox from the API, CLI or dashboard
Shell accessSSH, brokered through exe.devCommands, interactive shells and files through the SDK and CLI; no SSHSSH, plus exec and files over the API
Docker, root and systemdRoot, systemd and Docker in every VMCommands run as user 1000 by default, root on request; Docker inside not documentedDocker, systemd and root on every machine
Nested virtualizationEnterprise onlyNot documentedYes, /dev/kvm on every plan
ImagesBoot from your own Docker image in about two secondsBuild a snapshot from a Docker image or Dockerfile, then start sandboxes from itTemplates from named snapshots; no Dockerfile or OCI images
Saving stateDisk persists and is streamed to a second server; no snapshotsEnd a sandbox with a snapshot of its disk, or disk and memoryDisk saved every minute and on stop; a stopped sandbox costs nothing
Forkcp copies a VM's disk and config into a new VMNo live fork: the parent stops, then many sandboxes start from its snapshotFork a running sandbox; the original keeps running
Session lengthNo cap; VMs run until you stop themSandboxes run until you end them or their time to live ends; no idle detection or wake on requestNo cap on paid plans; you set the TTL
Inbound trafficHTTPS proxy for ports 3000 to 9999, one of them public; no public IP or raw TCPAll ports public; preview URLs coming soon; an experimental inbound allowlistHTTPS URLs for up to 50 ports, token-protected by default; raw TCP; dedicated IPv6 or IPv4
Desktop and computer useHeadless; no desktop or screen streamingNone; headless command and file access only60fps desktop and Chromium, computer use, browser control
Coding agentsClaude Code, Codex, Pi and Shelley preinstalled; only Shelley takes prompts through the APIRun your own agent through execs; a Harbor guide for agent evalsClaude Code, Codex, OpenCode and more preinstalled, with a prompt, steer and events API
Keeping API keys out of the sandboxIntegrations inject secrets at the network edge for any HTTP hostNo credentials proxy documentedCredentials proxy for model providers and any HTTPS API; switch accounts when one runs out of credits
Regions9 regions in the US, Europe, Asia and AustraliaNot publishedEU only: Germany, Finland, France
Every feature Battleships tracks (43)
Featureexe.devTogether Code Sandboxboat
Full VM (own kernel)YesYesYes
Docker insideYesNot publishedYes
Nested virtualizationYesNoYes
RootYesYesYes
SystemdYesNot publishedYes
Desktop GUINoNoYes
BrowserYesNoYes
Computer-use APINoNoYes
SSHYesNoYes
Persistent diskYesYesYes
Pause/resumeYesYesYes
Automatic snapshotsNoNoYes
Fork/cloneYesYesYes
Live fork (no pause)YesNoYes
Memory forkNoYesNo
Custom image (Docker or snapshot)YesYesYes
≥24 h sessionsYesYesYes
Idle auto-stopNoNoNo
Wake on requestNoNoNo
HTTPS preview URLsYesYesYes
Raw TCP inboundNoNoYes
Public IPv4NoNoNo
Egress allowlistNoNoNo
Secret proxyYesNoYes
Secret proxy for any APIYesNoYes
Preinstalled agentsYesNoYes
Agent harness APIYesNoYes
MCP serverYesYesNo
GPUNoNoNo
WindowsNoNoNo
Arm64NoNoNo
Self-hostingNoNoNo
BYOCYesNoNo
Open sourceNoNoNo
Scoped API keysYesNot publishedYes
Spend limitsNot publishedYesYes
Usage per sandbox (API)YesYesYes
Audit logsNot publishedNot publishedNo
SSOYesYesNo
SOC 2NoYesNo
HIPAANoNoNo
EU data residencyYesNot publishedYes
Zero data retentionNot publishedNot publishedYes

Performance

exe.devNot measured
Together Code SandboxNot measured
boat26.69 runs/s

Neither exe.dev nor Together Code Sandbox is in the hpc-sandbox-benchmarks run, so there is no comparable CPU measurement for either. boat did 26.69 runs per second on that Node.js test at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, on dedicated AMD Ryzen 9 9950X hosts. We don't guess how the other two would score.

Node.js build-and-test loop at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, higher is better. Measured with the open hpc-sandbox-benchmarks suite. exe.dev and Together Code Sandbox have no published run in this suite yet, so there is no like-for-like number to compare.

Pricing in five scenarios

Each bill is priced from the providers' public price lists by the open Battleships engine, with the cheapest plan that runs the scenario.

Scenarioexe.dev, a monthTogether Code Sandbox, a monthboat, a month
One coding agent, workdays
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, 8 hours a day, 22 days a month, files kept between days
$35 · Personal$5 · Together pay-as-you-go (prepaid credits; Code Interpreter only) · with limits$20 · $20/mo
One agent that never stops
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, running 24/7 all month
$35 · Personal$22 · Together pay-as-you-go (prepaid credits; Code Interpreter only) · with limits$26 · $20/mo
50 agents in parallel
50 machines of 4 vCPU / 8 GB at once, 8-hour sessions, 1,100 sessions a month, Docker inside
$1,848 · Personal$264 · Together pay-as-you-go (prepaid credits; Code Interpreter only) · with limits$317 · $20/mo × 3 seats
Sandboxes for your users
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 30,000 sessions of 10 minutes a month, up to 300 at once
$530 · Personal · with limits$900 · Together pay-as-you-go (prepaid credits; Code Interpreter only) · with limits$200 · $100/mo × 2 seats
1,000 short jobs at once
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 1,000 at once, 3 minutes each, 200,000 jobs a month
$1,050 · Personal · with limits$6,000 · Together pay-as-you-go (prepaid credits; Code Interpreter only) · with limits$2,000 · $2000/mo · with limits

exe.dev: Personal pools are a flat monthly fee for reserved vCPUs and memory that your VMs share, billed whether they are busy or idle. Standalone VMs bill per second at $0.105 per 2 vCPU / 4 GiB per hour.

Together Code Sandbox: Together lists Code Sandbox at $0.0446 per vCPU-hour and $0.0149 per GiB-hour, but the VMs must be enabled for your organization, so the table prices Code Interpreter: $0.03 per 60-minute session from prepaid credits.

Together Code Sandbox: Plans start at $20 a month, and the whole fee becomes usage credit. You pay per second while a sandbox runs, and a stopped sandbox costs nothing and keeps its disk.

Limits in those scenarios

The Together column is Code Interpreter, so it fits none of the scenarios: sessions last 60 minutes, nothing is kept after, it runs only Python and the machine size is not published. exe.dev fits the single-agent and 50-agent rows, but Personal stops at 50 VMs at once, so 300 or 1,000 at once do not fit. On boat the limit that bites is starts: 1,000 short jobs at once need more starts per hour and per day than even the top plan allows, so they queue.

Scenarioexe.devTogether Code Sandboxboat
One coding agent, workdays
  • flat pool: the tier is billed whether used or not
  • Together pay-as-you-go (prepaid credits; Code Interpreter only): sessions capped at 1 h
  • missing persistent disk
  • machine size not published
  • different kind of product: code interpreter
None that bite
One agent that never stops
  • flat pool: the tier is billed whether used or not
  • Together pay-as-you-go (prepaid credits; Code Interpreter only): sessions capped at 1 h
  • missing persistent disk
  • machine size not published
  • different kind of product: code interpreter
None that bite
50 agents in parallelNone that bite
  • Together pay-as-you-go (prepaid credits; Code Interpreter only): sessions capped at 1 h
  • missing persistent disk, Docker inside
  • machine size not published
  • different kind of product: code interpreter
None that bite
Sandboxes for your users
  • Personal: max 50 concurrent
  • machine size not published
  • different kind of product: code interpreter
  • machine size per session not published
  • egress price not published
None that bite
1,000 short jobs at once
  • Personal: max 50 concurrent
  • machine size not published
  • different kind of product: code interpreter
  • machine size per session not published
  • egress price not published
  • max 2,400 starts/day (needs ~6,667)
  • max 600 starts/hour (needs ~1,000)
  • bursts above 90 starts/min are queued (a burst of 333 takes ~4 min to start)

Which one should you use?

Use exe.dev when

you want a persistent VM you reach over SSH, booted from your own Docker image, in a region near you, with SSO and roles for your team.

  • A dev box you keep. For developers who want one VM to live in: SSH, root, Docker and a disk that stays, with no session cap.
  • Regions around the world. Useful if your users are far from Europe: exe.dev runs in nine regions across the US, Europe, Asia and Australia.
  • Team plan and an MCP server. Its Work plan covers a whole team with SSO and roles, and it serves an MCP server for controlling VMs.

Use Together Code Sandbox when

you already run models on Together and want light sandboxes you can save with their memory and branch from, or a simple Python runner billed per session.

  • Memory snapshots to branch from. Useful for rollouts and test variants: save a sandbox with its memory and start many copies with processes still running.
  • Sandboxes next to your models. Handy if you already run inference or fine-tuning on Together: sandboxes and models share one account and API key.
  • Very small machines and a Python runner. Good for many light jobs: sandboxes start at a tenth of a core, and a Python interpreter API bills per session.

Where boat fits

If you are choosing between exe.dev and Together because you run coding agents, boat sits between them: a full VM you can sign up for today, like exe.dev, with state saved while it runs and a fork of a running sandbox. It also adds what neither has: a desktop, /dev/kvm on every plan, private hosting and an API to drive agents inside from outside.

A screen your agents can use

exe.dev VMs and Together sandboxes are both headless, so an agent that must check a UI or click through a web app has nothing to look at until you build and stream a desktop yourself.

State saved every minute, and live forks

exe.dev has no snapshots, so one bad agent step can cost a session's work. Together snapshots only when a sandbox ends, so branching means stopping the parent first. boat saves every minute and forks a running sandbox.

Agents driven from outside, with private URLs

On exe.dev only Shelley takes prompts by API, and on Together you wire every step through execs while every port is public. boat prompts, steers and streams its preinstalled agents, and its HTTPS URLs are token-protected by default.

Use boat when your agents do real work for hours: builds, Docker, emulators, a desktop and a browser, with state saved every minute, live forks, private URLs and one API to drive agents inside from outside. Compare it one to one: boat vs exe.dev and boat vs Together Code Sandbox.

Questions people ask

Is exe.dev cheaper than Together Code Sandbox?

The only self-serve Together price is Code Interpreter, and it does not fit our scenarios because sessions end after 60 minutes and keep no disk. For one agent running all month exe.dev Personal is $35 a month, and boat is $26 a month. For 50 agents in parallel exe.dev is $1,848 a month and boat is $317 a month.

Which is faster, exe.dev or Together Code Sandbox?

Neither has a comparable CPU measurement in the hpc-sandbox-benchmarks run, so we can't say. boat scored 26.69 runs per second on that Node.js test at 4 vCPU / 8 GB.

Can exe.dev and Together Code Sandbox run Docker?

exe.dev VMs have root, systemd and Docker. Together builds sandboxes from Docker images, but its new SDK runs commands as a normal user by default and does not document Docker inside a sandbox. boat runs Docker, systemd and root on every machine.

Do they have snapshots?

exe.dev has none; it keeps each VM's disk on a second server, and cp copies a VM. Together can snapshot a sandbox's disk, or disk and memory, when it ends. boat saves the disk every minute and on stop, and can fork a running sandbox.

Can I sign up for Together Code Sandbox today?

The together-sandbox SDK and CLI must be enabled for your organization, so you ask Together for access. exe.dev and boat both let you sign up and start a VM yourself.

Can I run Claude Code on them?

exe.dev preinstalls Claude Code, Codex and Pi along with its Shelley agent. On Together you install your agent in your own image and run it through execs. boat preinstalls Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and more, with an API to prompt and steer them.

Try boat

Install the CLI, then run boat new.

7-day free trial

More comparisons